For Aristotle excellence is not an act but a habit and Hume regards habit as âthe great guide of lifeâ. However for Proust habit is problematic: âif habit is a second nature it prevents us from knowing our first. â What is habit? Do habits turn us into machines or free us to do more creative things? Should religious faith be habitual? Does habit help or hinder the practice of philosophy? Why do Luther Spinoza Kant Kierkegaard and Bergson all criticise habit? If habit is both a blessing and a curse how can we live well in our habits? In this thought-provoking book Clare Carlisle examines habit from a philosophical standpoint. Beginning with a lucid appraisal of habitâs philosophical history she suggests that both receptivity and resistance to change are basic principles of habit-formation. Carlisle shows how the philosophy of habit not only anticipates the discoveries of recent neuroscience but illuminates their ethical significance. She asks whether habit is a reliable form of knowledge by examining the contrasting interpretations of habitual thinking offered by Spinoza and Hume. She then turns to the role of habit in the good life tracing Aristotleâs legacy through the ideas of Joseph Butler Hegel and FÃlix Ravaisson and assessing the ambivalent attitudes to habit expressed by Nietzsche and Proust. She argues that a distinction between habit and practice helps to clarify this ambivalence particularly in the context of habit and religion where she examines both the theology of habit and the repetitions of religious life. She concludes by considering how philosophy itself is a practice of learning to live well with habit. . Language: English